blob: c77ec8bf8651734ed3c3622cf88185d3062db9ea (
plain) (
blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
|
\begin title
Front Page
\end title
\begin article
<div id="comments">
<blockquote>
<p>I agree that complicated components such as processors can be problematic as they are very often very difficult to review, change and fabricate but I don't align with it being a reason to consider Free Hardware Designs ("FHD") as not worthy of supporting, because as long as the designs are GPLv3-compatible then they can be changed to use more appropriate components.</p>
<p class="quote-origin">Jacob Hrbek via LibrePlanet-discuss</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yup. As a side note, it's like there are free software developers who also distribute binary packages. The binary packages themselves are hard to review and modify, but that's not a reason to be against free software.</p>
<p>However, making hardware that we can use is not as simple as putting the design through a compiler. Therefore we urge hardware manufacturers to adopt FGPAs and modular designs.</p>
<hr />
</div>
\end article
\begin complementary
<div id="please-participate" class="emph-box grad-green">
<h2>Participation</h1>
<p>Please participate in the <a href="https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libreplanet-discuss/2022-01/threads.html">LibrePlanet-discuss free hardware threads</a> if you have any ideas.</p>
<p>This directory is meant to be "comments" to this thread.</p>
</div>
\end complementary
|
